17 Comments
User's avatar
Anshul Puri's avatar

Excellent!

Expand full comment
Jonas's avatar

Excellent deep dive. Legend!

Expand full comment
Nicoper's Notes's avatar

It is just one way of looking at it. I could be wrong on so many things though.

Expand full comment
Andy's avatar

Great stuff. Thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment
Liberty's avatar

"(I would guess six Leonards are involved)"

While that's possible, my guess was that "L6" meant "L + 6 letters" or "Leonard", kind of like A16Z means "AndreessenHorowitz"

Expand full comment
Nicoper's Notes's avatar

Makes sense. Could have helped me to avoid an odd question to one of colleagues of mine from France, if L6 means something to him. 😉

Expand full comment
Luc's avatar

Great article! Fascinated by the calculations on time to terminality on the NOLs - never considered trying to attempt this as I am skeptical about reasoning to any normalized earnings for this business given its profile. Simply put, I see a position in PNP as a bet on management quality and disposition in the VMS niche.

Expand full comment
Nicoper's Notes's avatar

Correct. At these levels you are betting on them managing their positions better than an index. But, on rare occasion, you can even travel through time and by their portfolio below their own cost. This is a nice safety margin to have.

Expand full comment
Smaug's avatar

Awesome

Expand full comment
Tom Grlla's avatar

Just got round to this. Many thanks - very impressive & thorough.

The big question for me right now is about Damien Leonard. There doesn't seem to be much information about him. My instinct is that, without a lot more comfort on this, it can be dangerous to back the 'son of a Jockey'. Of course there are exceptions - the Dumas family have done well at Hermes, and there are some great dynasties in India. But right now, I have seen no information that would make me want to entrust my capital to him for the next 10 years.

Expand full comment
Nicoper's Notes's avatar

At least available history of Pinetree speaks to his name. In 3 years, you will have a decade of track record (and what a decade it was). I am not betting on him because of who his father is, but simply based on results I see, and the sphere where Pinetree is focused. There is much value to be uncovered in special situations, and SaaS world is full of them now, but I have far less time and capacity to do it on my own than people in Pinetree. So I delegated at an opportune moment, below the cost of their portfolio. At the end, it is a matter of personal comfort. You should not invest in them, as most likely you would feel the urge to sell them in the next downturn due to lack of trust.

Expand full comment
Tom Grlla's avatar

Thanks for your thoughts. Agreed. And you got in at a good time. I own SGN, so fish in similar waters - I suspect I may end up going through the Pinetree portfolio for ideas.

Expand full comment
Hunter of Free Time's avatar

Great description that requires a lot of work. Thank you.

Where did you find the companies that they have in portofolio?

Expand full comment
Dan's avatar

Excellent deep dive! Thank you! Where did you find the tables with Pinetree's holdings?

Expand full comment
Nicoper's Notes's avatar

From their annual MD&A. During quarterly updates, sometimes they leave clues if some positions are reduced, increased or sold out. In some cases, SEC disclosures also help identify them, like TruBridge in 2024.

Expand full comment
Chris Lamb's avatar

Thank you for this excellent write up.

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Jul 3
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Nicoper's Notes's avatar

They disclose it in their annual MD&A. Apart from that SEC filings sometimes help during period between year ends. Quarterly MD&A give clues on sales or additional purchases of existing holdings.

Expand full comment